Throughout the year various assignments, projects, and papers have aided me in becoming a better writer in both an academic sphere and otherwise. One such aid was these very TOW posts. Although my posts remained very consistent, they have shown signs of maturation. One of my early TOW's was about a political cartoon by famous graffiti artist, Banksy. In this post I listed the elements that made up the cartoon, but did not really explain their deeper effect (the way in which they helped/hindered the creator's message). This is in great contrast to one of my later TOW's about the an article featuring photographs of elderly people. The photographer has placed them in front of mirrors that depicted how they really saw themselves, and it was an extremely moving piece. When I wrote about it I was able to focus not only on the individual rhetorical choices made by the artist, but also on what those choices contributed to the final product.
I feel as though I have mastered identifying at least a few rhetorical devices in the majority of pieces I would be given to look at and I can also explain why they're significant/their overall effect. I do, however, find my self reverting to the same rhetorical devices in many cases and would aim to learn more that I could then utilize in my analysis of various pieces. Doing so would also strengthen me as a writer personally because I would then be able to use these devices in my own writing.
As previously mentioned, the purpose of these TOW assignments was to make us better readers and writers of mature non-fiction texts. I feel as though they helped a little bit, but really did not carry nearly as much weight as other writing assignments we worked on throughout the year. To be honest, I think the in-class essays given every few weeks helped me the most with my writing. I am aware that the TOW's can play a role in that, by providing examples to work from, but I don't feel as though they were significantly beneficial to me as a writer.
"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog
it's too dark to read." -Groucho Marx
Sunday, May 19, 2013
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
TOW Re-write
Dictionary Translates Ancient Egyptian Life
The article "Dictionary Translates Ancient Egypt Life" was written by John Noble Wilford of The New York Times. Wilford has been working as a journalist since 1956 when he started at the Wall Street Journal. He then joined The New York Times in 1965 as a science reported and, in 1969, he wrote the front-page article, "Men Walk on Moon". He’s received two Pulitzer prizes for his work.
Wilford's use of multiple specific examples and relative quotations allows the reader to understand how essential an all-encompassing dictionary of "common" Egyptian language is to modern historians and how it can be utilized as studies in these areas continue.
The article "Dictionary Translates Ancient Egypt Life" was written by John Noble Wilford of The New York Times. Wilford has been working as a journalist since 1956 when he started at the Wall Street Journal. He then joined The New York Times in 1965 as a science reported and, in 1969, he wrote the front-page article, "Men Walk on Moon". He’s received two Pulitzer prizes for his work.
This
particular article of his was about a dictionary that has been in the
works for over forty years at the Oriental Institute of the University
of Chicago. Numerous Egyptologists have devoted the better part of their
careers to the compilation of this dictionary in the hopes that it will
make translating Demotic documents easier. This article's exigence is
within an intellectual community of people trying to broaden historical
understanding, basically through a massive research tool. The
assumption that ancient Egyptians’ main communication was by
hieroglyphics is a common misconception. The language of the common
people in Egypt from 500 BC to about 500 AD, as well as one of the
languages found on the Rosetta Stone, is called Demotics. This article
served to explain how creating a large dictionary about Demotics could
unveil the Egyptians "words of love and family, the law and commerce,
private letters and texts on science, religion and literature" (Wilford
1).
It was written partly to the public, or readers of The New York Times,
but also partly to the community of intellectuals specializing in
historical research. It provided information regarding how the
dictionary could be accessed for free online and about its likely
ensuing publication, both of these things being useful heads-up's for
someone in that field of work.
Simile
was a form of rhetoric utilized in this article, for example, "What the
Chicago Demotic Dictionary does is what the Oxford English Dictionary
does". This comparison emphasizes the Demotic dictionary’s usefulness.
Wilford
accomplished his purpose by laying out what Demotic is and how it can
be used in the context of historical research. He even included quotes
from individuals such as James P. Allen, an Egyptologist at Brown
University. Dr. Allen said, "I could not have done what I did without
the dictionary," he said. “Or at least not as well.” Wilford went on to
explain that the newly defined words have already expanded upon pivotal
knowledge of Egyptian life. For example, many Egyptians kept their
records in Demotic, including financial records that spanned multiple
years. There has also been government legislation translated that
reveals interesting facts about an ancient Egyptian woman's role in
society. They "detailed a husband’s acknowledgment of the money his wife
brought into the marriage and the promise to provide her with a set
amount of food and money for clothing each year of their marriage".
Also, other contracts stated that women could own land and had the right
to divorce their husbands! It's interesting to see the stark contrast
between the way women were treated in Egyptian society and in other
flourishing societies (such as Roman, and then eventually European,
where they had little to no power).
Wilford's use of multiple specific examples and relative quotations allows the reader to understand how essential an all-encompassing dictionary of "common" Egyptian language is to modern historians and how it can be utilized as studies in these areas continue.
Monday, November 26, 2012
The Alienist by Caleb Carr
The Alienist
is a nonfiction crime novel by Caleb Carr, published in 1994. Carr is an
American novelist and military historian. He has received the Anthony Award for Best First Novel and the Grand Prix de Littérature Policière in
the International category. The Alienist focuses on the criminal atmosphere of New York City in
1896 and delves into the mob scene, corruptions within the New York City Police
Department, and unsolved murders. Prominent historical figures such as Theodore
Roosevelt and J.P. Morgan are mentioned to highlight the era and provide some
historical context for the period Carr is discussing. Thus far in my reading
these elements of the story have each been introduced, but not sufficiently flesh
out. I will write again on this book in a few weeks with more specific
information.
This novel is geared
towards an intelligent audience interested in nonfiction crime stories and the
intricate history of New York City. Its purpose lies along the same lines: to
inform the aforementioned audience about the complex social schemes and
mysterious happenings in Ney York during the 1890’s.
Carr has begun to
accomplish his purpose, but it remains unclear (a quarter of the way through
the book) whether or not he will adequately explain all of these topics. When
he is being particularly effective, he often uses the rhetorical device of
anecdote. In order to relate things like life back then in the mob scene to
modern society, Carr relies on personal stories and things he has learned
during his time as a student of history and literature. In doing this, he
explains topics that seem outdated from a 21st century
culturally-minded perspective.
10-Year-Old Accidentally Creates New Molecule in Science Class
The article titled "10-Year-Old Accidentally Creates New Molecule in Science Class" by Dan Nosowitz was published in Popular Science in February of 2012. Nosowitz is PopSci.com's Associate Editor. He has previously written for Fast Company, SmartPlanet, the Billfold, and Splitsider, and got his start at the gadget blog Gizmodo.
This piece focuses on ten-year-old Clara Lazen, a fifth grade student in Kansas City. Clara was given the old “ball and stick” model by her science teacher in class, and amazingly ended up constructing what seems to be a viable chemical. The chemical is tetranitratoxycarbon, composed of nitrogen, oxygen and carbon. At first her teacher, Kenneth Boehr, couldn’t be sure. He sent a photograph of the complexly structured molecule to a friend at Humboldt State University and its status as a legitimate molecule was confirmed. They are not sure of any applied purpose for the molecule yet, although it does have some potential to be used for energy storage or as an explosive. Boehr’s friend, Robert Zoeline, published a paper titled Computational and Theoretical Chemistry in which Clara is listed as a co-author.
The purpose of this article is to inform an audience interested in science and the general scientific community in a discovery both interesting for its content and discoverer. Nosowitz accomplishes this purpose by employing the rhetorical device of asides. He often stops to talk to his reader in order to further explain complicated scientific topics or just to expand upon an idea.
Source: http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-02/10-year-old-accidentally-creates-new-explosive-molecule-science-class
A Mirrored Memory
A Mirrored
Memory is the name of a collection of photographs by photographer Tom Hussey. Hussey’s compelling photography was featured in
Communication Arts 2010 Photography Annual. This collection stems from Hussey’s recent collaboration with a pharmaceutical
company launching a new drug that aids Alzheimer sufferers. It consists of
eight images, each containing an older individual and a reflection of their
mirrored youthful selves. Students, firemen, nurses and more transcend through
the mirror opposite each photograph’s subject. Due to the collection being
published on the internet, the general public can be considered its audience as
well as those specifically interested in photography or fans of Tom Hussey. The
purpose of these photos is to evoke the emotions associated with the disease in
order to promote the new drug. Hussey has obviously accomplished this through
the universal medium of photography. The most important rhetorical device used
in the composition of these photos is the expressions they contain. The severe or subtle difference
in each subject’s facial expression as compared to his or her “reflection”
speaks volumes of the person they used to be. This acts as a sort of visual
pathos, easily evoking emotion from a large base of viewers. Evoking this emotion accomplishes Hussey's purpose and provides an intimate view of the effects of the Alzheimer disease.
Let the Kids Rule the School
An article titled “Let the
Kids Rule the School”, by Susan Engel, appeared in the New York Times’ Opinion
Pages in March of 2011. Engel is a frequent op-ed contributor as well as a
developmental psychologist. She is also the author of Red Flags or Red Herrings: Predicting Who Your Child
Will Become. This article mainly focused on an educational experiment that
took place in New Marlborough, MA. A high school there had allowed a small
group of their students to participate in what the students soon fondly called
the Independence Project. Essentially they were given the freedom to create
their own curriculum and they ended up doing a pretty amazing job. They read
more books than the AP English classes at their school while also covering more
topics in math and science. They taught each other topics that interested them
and showcased new talents to the entire faculty and student body, such as
having had learned to cook or play the piano. Most importantly, they made
learning worthwhile. Engel’s wrote this article to discuss a very interesting
social experiment in education and its results. Her purpose is fairly clear as
the article comes to a close and she says, “We have tried making the school day longer and blanketing students
with standardized tests. But perhaps children don’t need another reform imposed
on them. Instead, they need to be the authors of their own education.” This
article is written to an audience interested in psychology, social
experimentation, education, or possibly even education reform. Engel’s most
common form of rhetoric used is syllogism. She presents an inarguable fact
about education and logically lays out why experiments like the Independence
Project are beneficial in a way that is difficult to argue with. In doing this
she weaves a very interesting argument and provides insight into a not commonly
heard of reform movement.
Monday, November 12, 2012
"The Youth in Asia" By David Sedaris
I came across David Sedaris's short story,
"The Youth in Asia", and decided to read it since I had enjoyed a
work of his assigned in class, "Me Talk Pretty One Day". Sedaris
writes humorous short stories and makes frequent appearances on talk shows and
radio stations. He was nominated for three Grammy Awards for Best Spoken Word
and Best Comedy Album.
This specific short story chronicled the Sedaris
family’s interesting history with household pets. He’s describes about a dozen
or so being put to sleep before the story comes to a close. His parents’ Great
Dane, Melina, received much of the focus. Once all of the Sedaris children had “left
the nest” so to speak, David’s parents had felt a sense of emptiness. They
choose to fill this void with a giant dog. Sedaris includes a myriad of asides
in his writing, mainly for the purpose of entertaining an audience with a humorous
story. The purpose of this piece was also to communicate that life goes on and
it will continue to do so whether we choose to keep up with it or not. Sedaris
describes learning this difficult lesson in “The Youth in Asia” when he says, “The
cat's death struck me as the end of an era. The end of my safe college life,
the last of my thirty-inch waist, my faltering relationship with my first real
boyfriend--I cried for it all and spent the next several months wondering why
so few songs were written about cats.” Having a pet provides an opportunity to
learn what it is like to be responsible for another living thing. Sometimes the
weight of that fact is not valued. Sedaris strives to explain that his cat was
not just a cat, just as Melina was not just any dog. Melina brought his parents
together in their old age and lived through the last 10 years of their married
life.
This story was written to an audience of basically
anyone who wanted to read it. It was posted online so the body of people with
access to it is large and varied. I’m sure there is a more specific sect of
those people, like me, that are fans of Sedaris or comedic writing in general
and sought out a piece aligned with those interests.
A rhetorical device most effectively utilized in
this story is the previously mentioned asides. Even the title goes back to an
aside. To make a connection to the difficult act of deciding a pet should be
put down, Sedaris reminisced of an old cartoon he used to enjoy about two
Japanese school boys. The show was titled Fat and Skinny. One boy, Komatsu,
urged his exaggeratedly plump peer to climb a flag pole. When “Fat” explained
that he couldn’t, for it was too hard, Komatsu simply replied, “Oh but you can
do it. You must. It is required.” Sedaris repeatedly refers to the “Youth in
Asia” thereafter, and continues to include how they would feel about the deaths
of his various pets.
The short story accomplishes its purpose of
providing a humorous tale and entertains readers to the very end. Sedaris
provides many anecdotes throughout about specific pets that didn’t last very
long and family events that keep a difficult subject (pet death) very
lighthearted.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
